Wednesday, December 19, 2012

U P Sugar industry - Rs 3,000-cr loss..

UP sugar industry stares at Rs 3,000-cr loss
With the impact of 16% increase in cane prices announced on Friday, stocks of sugar companies also get crushed
Ajay Modi / New Delhi Dec 11, 2012, 00:42 IST

The sugar industry in India’s biggest-producing state, Uttar Pradesh, is staring at a loss of Rs 3,000 crore this season (October-September), after the 16 per cent increase in sugarcane price announced on Friday evening. Stocks of sugar companies like Balrampur Chini and Triveni Engineering got crushed, even as the market ended flat.
In the first year of its tenure, the Samajwadi Party-led state government increased the state advised price ( SAP) of sugarcane by Rs 40 a quintal across varieties. The new price is Rs 280 and Rs 290 a quintal for normal and early varieties, respectively. “In states like Tamil Nadu, Haryana and Punjab, where the system of SAP prevails, the price is much lower. Mills in Haryana and Punjab will pay Rs 240 for sugarcane, while those in Tamil Nadu will pay only Rs 225 a quintal,” said S L Gupta, secretary of the UP Sugar Mills Association.

Gupta said at the new cane price, the cost of sugar production would be Rs 3,500-3,600 per quintal, while the current realisation is ruling around Rs 3,250. “If sugar prices remain at these levels, the UP industry will incur a loss of Rs 3,000 crore in the season on output of eight million tonnes,” he noted.
 
A BITTER PILL
CompanyClosing share price
on Dec 10 (in Rs)
Change over
previous day (%)
Dhampur Sugar60.00-6.61
Balrampur Chini55.40-9.25
Dwarikesh Sugar40.15-4.29
Bajaj Hindusthan27.55-1.25
Triveni Engineering 19.95-5.23
Source: BSE

The industry was all along anticipating a lower increase in the sugarcane price since last year. The Predecessor, Mayawati government, too, had raised prices by Rs 40 per quintal. “Banks are concerned about the impact of this hike. They had been positive on the sector when realisations improved to Rs 3,600 a quintal in September. However, at this sugarcane price, a loss is unavoidable and we will face problems in making sugarcane price payment to farmers. Ideally, the price should have been hiked by Rs 20 per quintal,” said Kishor Shah, director (finance) at Balrampur Chini that owns 10 mills in the state.
The positives of a possible increase in sugar prices have been negated by the Rs 40 rise. According to Icra, UP-based sugar mills will benefit from higher prices in sugar season 2012-13 as well as higher crushing volumes and also higher recovery rates but higher cane costs are likely to substantially offset this positive impact. However, Icra expects upside if the recommendations of the Rangarajan Committee regarding abolition of levy sugar is accepted and/or ethanol prices see a revision.
Interestingly, the UP sugar industry is not looking to legally challenge this rise, as it had been doing often in recent years. “We are not thinking of a legal recourse. We plead with the state government to grant incentives like waiver of Rs 2 purchase tax on every quintal of sugarcane we buy, reducing society commission from Rs 5.10 to Rs 2.10 a quintal and elimination of the three per cent entry tax levied on the sugar produced and consumed within the state,” Gupta said.

Friday, November 23, 2012

BUY INFOSYS - TARGET HIGH !!!


5 reasons why Infosys is the stock to watch out for in 2013

Sunday, November 18, 2012

GAIN-20 per cent daily!!

There's method in madness
Even high-risk takers have a rigid adherence to a plan which is admirable
Devangshu Datta / New Delhi Nov 19, 2012, 00:51 IST

One of my friends is a dedicated trader with a very unusual, high-risk style. He is only interested in highly liquid stock futures contracts. On average, the margin on a stock futures contract is roughly 15 per cent – about 6.6 times leverage.
My friend is only interested in futures that have lots of 4,000 shares or more. Ideally, he prefers lots of 8,000 shares or more. For a 4,000 lot, a swing of 10 paisa is worth roughly Rs 400, gain or loss, neglecting brokerages. A Rs 1 swing therefore implies a gain or loss of Rs 4,000 per lot. It’s double that for an 8,000 lot and three times as much for a 12,000 lot.
There are 33 stock futures available with lots of 4,000 or more. By the way, these stocks also meet most reasonable standards for diversification. They are all large caps, of course, (like all stocks in the F&O segment) and between them, these 33 cover some 18 sectors.
On an average, a Rs 1 swing is equivalent to 14 per cent of margin for that select group of 33. Not surprisingly, my friend's returns are extraordinarily variable. There are days when he doubles his margin and days when he loses half of it. According to him, he tends to make or lose nearly 20 per cent a day. He makes money a little more often than he loses, and he usually makes more on a winning trade than he loses when he's wrong.
It should be mentioned that he's a horse-racing aficionado, who entered financial markets simply because they have more financial depth than horse-races. So he's got the stomach required to sleep soundly at night while operating at these risks-levels.
Having decided to operate in this fashion however, he has been sensible enough to do his best to eliminate unnecessary losses. He allocates his bets carefully and he never has an exposure of more than 20 per cent of his capital at a given instant. He doesn't ever carry overnight positions.
He has strict stop losses. He never doubles up or averages down. He absolutely ignores all extraneous data. He is not interested where the Nifty is going, or what the European Central Bank is doing and its impact on currency positions. He will not bet on anything outside this group, no matter how tempting it may seem. Given the diversification within the group however, this is not a major constraint. Marketwide or sector-specific moves are usually reflected.
Within the group of 33, he watches everything of short-term interest. This is not so difficult, given the internet and reasonable computer literacy. He has automated alerts for all news pertaining to these 33 stocks. He has constructed an index, which incorporates this population. He runs a colour-coded “map of the group” (red for losers, green for winners) to give him a visual heads-up. He knows the correlations of each of these stocks with the Nifty and their cross-correlations with each other. He runs technical analysis on various parameters to try and isolate the trends within the group. He tracks insider disclosures and FII/DII holdings and buy/sell patterns.
Applying these methods keep him occupied and interested as well as being quite profitable on the whole. These methods are also scalable to a larger population of stocks as well, and to stocks chosen according to less hair-raising volatility criteria.
What may not scale is the almost inhuman discipline. It is one thing to decide, right or wrong, that a given set of instruments will suit your trading style the most. It is entirely another to be able to focus on those instruments to the exclusion of everything else.
I wouldn't advocate using these methods. Even experienced traders might find 20 per cent daily swings scary. Nor are his risk-management methods necessarily the best. But the rigid adherence to a plan is admirable.

http://www.businessstandard.com/india/news/there/s-method-in-madness/492921/

Friday, November 9, 2012

Essar Oil......profit zooms 27 times


Essar Oil operating profit zooms 27 times

Published: Saturday, Nov 10, 2012, 7:26 IST 
By Promit Mukherjee | Place: Mumbai | Agency: DNA
Essar Oil, the flagship oil and gas business of Essar Group, reported a 27-time jump in its operating profit for the quarter ended September, riding on a 66% jump in refinery throughput and a four-fold increase in processing ultra-heavy crude.
The ability to process ultra-heavy crude indicates its refinery has a higher complexity. This allows it to purchase and process low-quality crude, which costs less, and produce refined products such as petrol, diesel, and kerosene, to be sold at market-linked prices.“With the completion of our optimisation programme at Vadinar, we were able to post a throughput of 5.07 million metric tonne,” said L K Gupta, managing director and chief operating officer, Essar Oil.
He said the refinery has reached its full capacity of 20 million tonne per annum and the impact has started to reflect from the last quarter, with revenues rising.Also, as the refinery’s Nelson complexity (a measure of its ability to process low-quality crude) has increased, the company was also able to produce middle and light distillates, essentially high-premium petroleum products, which bring in higher margins, reflecting in higher earnings before interest, tax depreciation and amortisation (Ebitda). Gross revenue for the quarter stood at Rs23,023 crore, up 67% on year, while Ebitda was up 27 times at Rs1,169 crore compared with Rs43 crore (post sales tax impact).Profit after tax was at Rs105 crore as against a loss of Rs419 crore (post sales tax impact) in the same period last year after.The company also posted a gross refining margin of $7.86 per barrel, up 55% compared with $5.07 per barrel (without sales tax incentive) in Q2FY12, which was one of its highest in the last several quarters.
http://www.dnaindia.com/money/report_essar-oil-operating-profit-zooms-27-times_1762802

Sunday, October 28, 2012

BUY JSW STEEL...STEAL THE PROFITS!!!!!!!


JSW Q2 net profit up 547%

AGENCIES

Posted: Sunday, Oct 28, 2012 at 1941 hrs IST
New Delhi : JSW Steel Ltd today reported 547 per cent jump in its standalone profit to Rs 822 crore for the second quarter ended September on the back of higher volumes and rupee appreciation.
The company's profit in the same period last year stood at Rs 127 crore.
"Net sales grew by 16 per cent to Rs 8,834 crore during the quarter ended September against Rs 7,625 crore in the year-ago period," the company said in a statement.
"Due to 6.4 per cent appreciation in the value of the rupee against the dollar during Q2 of 2012-13, the gain of Rs 422 crore on restatement of foreign currency monetary items at close of the quarter credited to profit and loss account, has been considered by the company as exceptional in nature," it
said.
"The company posted profit of Rs 822 crore up by 547 per cent over the corresponding quarter of previous year mainly on higher volumes....http://www.financialexpress.com/news/jsw-q2-net-profit-up-547-/1023157/

Saturday, October 27, 2012

BANKS FAILURE..DANGER...EURO CRISIS


Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 11:30

The immeasurable risk European banks may be hiding

There is growing concern among policymakers and analysts that the true extent of European banks' debt problems is being masked. There is growing concern among policymakers and analysts that the true extent of European banks' debt problems is being masked.


Sir Mervyn King, Governor of the Bank of England, became the most high-profile policymaker to date to warn of the dangers of banks putting off foreclosures in a speech Tuesday night.
His stern warning to UK banks that they need to drop the "pretense" that some of their bad debts will be repaid was coupled with the statement that they have "insufficient capital" to deal with losses which have remained undeclared.
Essentially, what seems to have happened is that banks across the euro zone have put off foreclosures on weak businesses - a process known as forbearance. This has been enabled by low interest rates across the region and rescue packages which have injected unprecedented amounts of liquidity into the banking system and helped keep struggling economies afloat.
The scale of forbearance is hinted at in relatively low rates of company insolvencies.
In the UK, despite the recession, insolvency rates are similar to 2002, when the economy grew by 1.6 percent, according to government figures.
Greece's problems have been well flagged - yet just five Greek companies were declared insolvent in 2011, the year it was forced to seek a bailout from international lenders, fewer than in 2007, when its economy was still growing.
This persists across the euro zone, with the weakest economies sometimes experiencing its lowest insolvency rates.
In 2011, the number of insolvencies per 10,000 companies was lowest in Greece, Spain, Italy and Portugal, according to calculations from Creditreform.
However, as Nigel Myer, director of credit strategy at Lloyds, pointed out, the extent of this is "effectively invisible" and "almost impossible to quantify." Decisions are made by individual banks and they do not have to declare them under accountancy rules.
Putting off foreclosure could be dangerous not only because it masks the true state of businesses, but because it could mean a faster rate of insolvencies if banks decide to change their policies in response to a worsening economy, with potential damage to employment figures and the broader economy - and to the banks themselves.
"To the extent that forbearance has taken place, a worsening economic environment in these countries could lead to a faster rate of deterioration in asset quality than might be inferred from reported numbers," Myer warned.
Of course, delaying the repayment of non-performing loans can be positive for the economy, particularly in the short-term.
"It has allowed companies to survive and people to be employed," as Myer pointed out. "It also very likely supports tax receipts and reduces the need for social security support."
Sir Mervyn's warning does not chime with other influential figures in the UK.
Andrew Bailey, a member of the Bank's Financial Policy Committee and head of prudential regulation at UK regulator the Financial Services Authority, thanked the banks for their actions earlier in October.
The European countries least likely to be affected by forbearance following worse-than-expected economic data are Switzerland, Austria and Denmark, according to Myer, who suggested spreads in Swiss banks and the recent rally in Danish spreads should be supported by worries about forbearance.

Written by Catherine Boyle, CNBC. Twitter: @cboylecnbc.

Tuesday, October 23, 2012

NO MORE PROFITABLE WITH PENNY STCKS


How to steer clear of stocks that do the vanishing act

LOKESHWARRI S.K.
Small-cap stocks with weak fundamentals and no institutional holding are more susceptible to suspension. If you are among those passive investors who review their portfolios once in two or three years, chances are high that one day you would be found wondering how to sell stocks such as NEPC Agro or Jord Engineers or Sanghi Polyester that are part of your holding. These stocks have disappeared from stock exchanges and investor radar.
It is not just these stocks that have done the vanishing act. The Bombay Stock Exchange sports a list of around 1,700 stocks that have been de-listed and another 1,220 that have been suspended from trading.
Investors in shares that are de-listed have it relatively easy. In voluntary delisting, the promoter offers to buy back shares from the public due to various reasons, including merger of companies, public holding falling below prescribed limits or because the promoter wishes to own the entire stake. When the company is liquidated, the shares are compulsorily de-listed from exchanges.
Such closure is not available in suspended stocks. When shares of a company are suspended from trading, it remains a possibility that the company could comply with exchange regulations and re-list. Investors continuing to hold such shares are left with no exit route when the company decides to forego listing and move away from public glare.

THE RULES

Companies have to make periodic disclosure to exchanges on their financial statements, shareholding pattern, trading in company’s shares by insiders, adhering to corporate governance practices and so on as part of the listing agreement signed with exchanges. When companies fail or are late in making these disclosures, they could land in trouble.
The Bombay Stock Exchange stops trading in shares of companies which do not make the above disclosures. For instance, companies that do not submit quarterly financial results in two consecutive quarters or are late in the submission in two of the previous four quarters will invite penal action in the form of suspension.
The rules followed by the National Stock Exchange are slightly different. Non-compliant companies are served show-cause notice by the exchange. Based on the response, a committee decides whether the shares of the company need to be suspended or not.
Suspension can be revoked once the companies follow the requirements of the listing agreement for a specified period. BSE additionally requires that the promoter holding should be locked in for a year from the date of revocation, the company should have signed a demat agreement with at least one depository participant and it should have its own Web site.

TRENDS

It is, however, obvious from a quick perusal of the list put out by the BSE and NSE that companies are using the suspension route to disappear. The Bombay Stock Exchange Web site lists around 1,220 stocks in which trading has been halted due to penal reasons since 1995. The list on NSE contains 155 companies, with few companies featuring in both lists.
Suspension of companies has accelerated after the dotcom bubble of 2000. Between 2000 and 2005, BSE suspended 983 companies while NSE suspended 102 companies. This accounts for 81 and 67 per cent of total suspension list on BSE and NSE, respectively.
While suspensions were seen tapering off since 2005, there is a spike in the first nine months of 2012. The number of companies suspended from trading in this period is double the number reported for entire 2011 on both the exchanges.
Analysing the profile of the suspended companies, three trends emerge.
Some sectors account for a disproportionate share of the suspended companies. Companies in sectors that have been in extended business down-cycle have, in some cases, turned loss-making, and slip up in making regular filings with the exchanges. This leads to eventual exit from stock exchanges too. Textiles and apparels reported the maximum number of suspended companies as this sector, hit by both excess supply and rising input costs, has been in a slump for over a decade now.
Stocks such as Akai Impex, Salem Textiles and Arihant Cotsyn that were once trading favourites now feature in the suspended companies list. The same applies for the chemical industry that reported 50 suspended companies, including S M Dyechem and J F Laboratories.
Many small and medium enterprises in industries requiring lower capital outlay that raised funds through stock markets were unable to withstand the vagaries of business and economic cycles. With deteriorating financial conditions, many such companies also stopped complying with exchange requirements that then led to their suspension. Companies in sectors such as food packaging, auto ancillaries and edible oils are cases in point.
Last, some sectors emerge as the ‘theme’ of the moment with investors buying stocks in the sector regardless of the fundamentals, promoter credentials and so on. Investors willing to buy Internet companies at astronomic valuations at the turn of the century, or running after infrastructure companies post-2005 are examples of such irrationality. Who can forget yesteryear darlings such as Silverline Technologies, Pentagon Global or DSQ Software?

GUIDE-POSTS

The market regulator is unable to find a viable solution to return investor funds locked in such suspended companies. Suggestions range from making the promoter buy back these shares and de-list to exchanges using the investor protection fund to recompense investors.
While not much can be done if you are already holding stocks in these companies, it is imperative to steer clear of these companies in future. What are the guideposts that investors can watch out for? We analysed the stocks suspended by BSE in 2012 to identify a few signals.
The stock price of the company is the first giveaway. The range between which these stocks traded was Re 0.17 and Rs 58. Eight out of every ten stocks suspended traded at less than Rs 10. That is, most of these stocks fall in the penny stock category (if we define penny stocks as those that trade at values less than Rs 10. Fifteen per cent of the stocks were priced at less than Re 1.
Almost all companies suspended by BSE this year belonged to the small-cap segment, with market capitalisation of less than Rs 50 crore. Almost 70 per cent of these companies had market capitalisation less than Rs 10 crore with many having market cap of even less than a crore.
Barring a few exceptions, institutional holding, both domestic and foreign, in these stocks is absent. It is, of course, obvious that the small market capitalisation, low liquidity and deteriorating finances would keep these large investors away thus increasing the impact cost on these counters.
A quick scan of the companies’ financial statements would definitely flash red for risk-averse investors. These companies had depleted reserves of less that a crore or even negative reserves. Over three-fourth of the companies had less than a crore in cash in their books. Half the companies reported revenue of less that Rs 10 crore and a third of the companies reported operating losses.
If you are among the brave-hearts who would want to dabble with these high-risk stocks with the intention of making a killing at some date, you need to scan the exchange announcements at least once every week. The exchanges put out notices of companies due for suspension in advance so that investors can exit these stocks.
Also keep scanning SEBI announcements regarding companies the regulator is investigating for trading violations. Such companies are also likely to get suspended, if found guilty. Beware of IPOs with low credit rating because many of these suspended companies stem from IPOs with doubtful credentials.